Trump Said He Would Change Fort Moore Back To Benning. What Do You Think?
1. Ashlee Fields: “I’m not surprised. I’m laughing my - - - off. The last time America was
By Wane A. Hailes
In any thriving democracy, the cornerstone of civic engagement is the assurance that the populace has the power to elect their representatives. This principle not only lies at the heart of democratic representation but also ensures stringent accountability in public office. Yet, the current policy allowing city council members to appoint individuals to certain positions rather than holding elections has eroded this fundamental democratic value.
Democratic representation hinges on the concept that elected officials are chosen by the people, for the people. When individuals are directly elected by their constituents, it forms a vital connection between the public and their representatives. This bond ensures that the policies and decisions made reflect the will and needs of the community.
Appointing city officials, rather than electing them, disrupts this connection. When representatives are placed in office by a select few council members, it removes the element of choice from the people, leaving them disenfranchised and disillusioned. This approach not only sidesteps the democratic process but also risks creating a governance system that is less responsive to the needs and desires of the community.
Accountability is paramount in maintaining trust in public offices. Elected officials are inherently answerable to the voters—they must justify their decisions and actions to retain their positions during subsequent elections. This system of checks and balances promotes transparency and responsiveness.
However, when appointments are made behind closed doors, it undermines this critical accountability. Appointed officials may feel more accountable to the council members who selected them than the electorate. This can lead to decisions that benefit a small group rather than the broader community. The lack of direct accountability to voters can result in complacency, reduced performance, and corruption.
An electoral system for appointive city positions empowers citizens and restores faith in local governance. When officials are elected directly by the people, it ensures that they are accountable to their entire constituency, not just the city council.